↓ Skip to main content

Expertise in medicine: using the expert performance approach to improve simulation training

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Education, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expertise in medicine: using the expert performance approach to improve simulation training
Published in
Medical Education, January 2014
DOI 10.1111/medu.12306
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joe Causer, Paul Barach, A Mark Williams

Abstract

We critically review how medical education can benefit from systematic use of the expert performance approach as a framework for measuring and enhancing clinical practice. We discuss how the expert performance approach can be used to better understand the mechanisms underpinning superior performance among health care providers and how the framework can be applied to create simulated learning environments that present increased opportunities to engage in deliberate practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 23 12%
Other 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 67 34%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 33%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Psychology 18 9%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#1,854
of 3,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,827
of 319,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#25
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.