You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Risk Based on CFH, LOC387715/HTRA1, and Smoking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040355 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne E Hughes, Nick Orr, Chris Patterson, Hossein Esfandiary, Ruth Hogg, Vivienne McConnell, Giuliana Silvestri, Usha Chakravarthy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#4,535
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,255
of 168,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#43
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.