Title |
Integrated care as a means to improve primary care delivery for adults and adolescents in the developing world: a critical analysis of Integrated Management of Adolescent and Adult Illness (IMAI)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-12-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ashwin Vasan, Andrew Ellner, Stephen D Lawn, Sandy Gove, Manzi Anatole, Neil Gupta, Peter Drobac, Tom Nicholson, Kwonjune Seung, David C Mabey, Paul E Farmer |
Abstract |
More than three decades after the 1978 Declaration of Alma-Ata enshrined the goal of 'health for all', high-quality primary care services remain undelivered to the great majority of the world's poor. This failure to effectively reach the most vulnerable populations has been, in part, a failure to develop and implement appropriate and effective primary care delivery models. This paper examines a root cause of these failures, namely that the inability to achieve clear and practical consensus around the scope and aims of primary care may be contributing to ongoing operational inertia. The present work also examines integrated models of care as a strategy to move beyond conceptual dissonance in primary care and toward implementation. Finally, this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of a particular model, the World Health Organization's Integrated Management of Adolescent and Adult Illness (IMAI), and its potential as a guidepost toward improving the quality of primary care delivery in poor settings. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
Austria | 1 | 8% |
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 20% |
Researcher | 34 | 18% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 47 | 26% |
Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Unknown | 40 | 22% |