↓ Skip to main content

Identification of miRNAs and their target genes in developing maize ears by combined small RNA and degradome sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Identification of miRNAs and their target genes in developing maize ears by combined small RNA and degradome sequencing
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongjun Liu, Cheng Qin, Zhe Chen, Tao Zuo, Xuerong Yang, Huangkai Zhou, Meng Xu, Shiliang Cao, Yaou Shen, Haijian Lin, Xiujing He, Yinchao Zhang, Lujiang Li, Haiping Ding, Thomas Lübberstedt, Zhiming Zhang, Guangtang Pan

Abstract

In plants, microRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous ~22 nt RNAs that play important regulatory roles in many aspects of plant biology, including metabolism, hormone response, epigenetic control of transposable elements, and stress response. Extensive studies of miRNAs have been performed in model plants such as rice and Arabidopsis thaliana. In maize, most miRNAs and their target genes were analyzed and identified by clearly different treatments, such as response to low nitrate, salt and drought stress. However, little is known about miRNAs involved in maize ear development. The objective of this study is to identify conserved and novel miRNAs and their target genes by combined small RNA and degradome sequencing at four inflorescence developmental stages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 128 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 26%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Computer Science 3 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,119,308
of 23,416,487 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,650
of 10,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,877
of 309,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#86
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,416,487 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,766 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.