↓ Skip to main content

What Do We Know About Patient–Clinician Interactions with Interpreters?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
What Do We Know About Patient–Clinician Interactions with Interpreters?
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11606-012-2290-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable, Leah S. Karliner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Linguistics 4 9%
Psychology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,057
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,963
of 285,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#39
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.