| Title |
The effectiveness of physiotherapy for cervical dystonia: a systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-013-7220-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joke De Pauw, Kevin Van der Velden, Jill Meirte, Ulrike Van Daele, Steven Truijen, Patrick Cras, Rudy Mercelis, Willem De Hertogh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,677,394
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#496
of 5,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,688
of 322,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.