↓ Skip to main content

Missed opportunities in prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Missed opportunities in prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: a cross-sectional study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp14x676447
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P Sheppard, Kate Fletcher, Richard J McManus, Jonathan Mant

Abstract

Screening cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is an important part of CVD prevention. The success of screening is dependent on the rigour with which treatments are subsequently prescribed. AIM To establish the extent to which treatment conforms to guidelines.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 40%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,496,461
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,778
of 4,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,409
of 319,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#26
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.