| Title |
Female-to-Male Patients Have High Prevalence of Unsatisfactory Paps Compared to Non-Transgender Females: Implications for Cervical Cancer Screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2753-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah M. Peitzmeier, Sari L. Reisner, Padmini Harigopal, Jennifer Potter |
| Abstract |
Little is known about whether and how screening for cancers of natal reproductive structures, including cervical cancer, in female-to-male (FTM) transgender individuals differs from cancer screening among non-transgender females. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#336,517
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#275
of 8,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,268
of 337,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.