You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social isolation schema responds to positive social experiences: Longitudinal evidence from vulnerable populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Clinical Psychology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjc.12042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tegan Cruwys, Genevieve A. Dingle, Matthew J. Hornsey, Jolanda Jetten, Tian P. S. Oei, Zoe C. Walter |
| Abstract |
Maladaptive schemas are stable cognitive working models of the world, learnt early in life, that interfere with effective functioning and underlie chronic mental illness. A major challenge for cognitive therapy has been how to modify schemas when they are so enduring and stable. We propose that because maladaptive schemas are formed through social experiences (typically abusive or neglectful ones), they might best be corrected through positive social experiences that directly challenge the schema. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 67 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,530,952
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Psychology
#371
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,261
of 317,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Psychology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.