You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Be Screened for Cerebral Aneurysms?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a3437 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.N. Rozenfeld, S.A. Ansari, A. Shaibani, E.J. Russell, P. Mohan, M.C. Hurley |
| Abstract |
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is a genetic disorder affecting 1 in 1000 people worldwide and is associated with an increased risk of intracranial aneurysms. It remains unclear whether there is sufficient net benefit to screening this patient population for IA, considering recent developments in imaging and treatment and our evolving understanding of the natural history of unruptured aneurysms. There is currently no standardized screening protocol for IA in patients with ADPCKD. Our review of the literature focused on the above issues and presents our appraisal of the estimated value of screening for IA in the setting of ADPCKD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 61% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,692,093
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,161
of 5,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,966
of 292,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.