↓ Skip to main content

DTWscore: differential expression and cell clustering analysis for time-series single-cell RNA-seq data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
DTWscore: differential expression and cell clustering analysis for time-series single-cell RNA-seq data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1647-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhuo Wang, Shuilin Jin, Guiyou Liu, Xiurui Zhang, Nan Wang, Deliang Wu, Yang Hu, Chiping Zhang, Qinghua Jiang, Li Xu, Yadong Wang

Abstract

The development of single-cell RNA sequencing has enabled profound discoveries in biology, ranging from the dissection of the composition of complex tissues to the identification of novel cell types and dynamics in some specialized cellular environments. However, the large-scale generation of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data collected at multiple time points remains a challenge to effective measurement gene expression patterns in transcriptome analysis. We present an algorithm based on the Dynamic Time Warping score (DTWscore) combined with time-series data, that enables the detection of gene expression changes across scRNA-seq samples and recovery of potential cell types from complex mixtures of multiple cell types. The DTWscore successfully classify cells of different types with the most highly variable genes from time-series scRNA-seq data. The study was confined to methods that are implemented and available within the R framework. Sample datasets and R packages are available at https://github.com/xiaoxiaoxier/DTWscore .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 31%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 22%
Computer Science 7 8%
Mathematics 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,763,624
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,039
of 7,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,982
of 314,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#27
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.