↓ Skip to main content

Neurofeedback Intervention in Fibromyalgia Syndrome; a Randomized, Controlled, Rater Blind Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Neurofeedback Intervention in Fibromyalgia Syndrome; a Randomized, Controlled, Rater Blind Clinical Trial
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10484-010-9135-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sadi Kayıran, Erbil Dursun, Nigar Dursun, Numan Ermutlu, Sacit Karamürsel

Abstract

We designed a randomized, rater blind study to assess the efficacy of EEG Biofeedback (Neurofeedback-NFB) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Eighteen patients received twenty sessions of NFB-sensory motor rhythm (SMR) treatment (NFB group) during 4 weeks, and eighteen patients were given 10 mg per day escitalopram treatment (control group) for 8 weeks. Visual Analog Scales for pain and fatigue, Hamilton and Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory Scales, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and Short Form 36 were used as outcome measures which were applied at baseline and 2nd, 4th, 8th, 16th, 24th weeks. Mean amplitudes of EEG rhythms (delta, theta, alpha, SMR, beta1 and beta2) and theta/SMR ratio were also measured in NFB group. All post-treatment measurements showed significant improvements in both of the groups (for all parameters p < 0.05). NFB group displayed greater benefits than controls (for all parameters p < 0.05). Therapeutic efficacy of NFB was found to begin at 2nd week and reached to a maximum effect at 4th week. On the other hand, the improvements in SSRI treatment were also detected to begin at 2nd week but reached to a maximum effect at 8th week. No statistically significant changes were noted regarding mean amplitudes of EEG rhythms (p > 0.05 for all). However, theta/SMR ratio showed a significant decrease at 4th week compared to baseline in the NFB group (p < 0.05). These data support the efficacy of NFB as a treatment for pain, psychological symptoms and impaired quality of life associated with fibromyalgia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 290 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 19%
Neuroscience 34 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Engineering 14 5%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 72 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,426,857
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#89
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,957
of 96,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.