↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Analysis Method of 89Sr and 90Sr in Effluent with a Liquid Scintillation Counter

Overview of attention for article published in Radioisotopes, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 225)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Analysis Method of 89Sr and 90Sr in Effluent with a Liquid Scintillation Counter
Published in
Radioisotopes, January 2010
DOI 10.3769/radioisotopes.59.319
Authors

Masanao NAKANO, Yoshinori HIYAMA, Hitoshi WATANABE, Shuuichi SUMIYA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Radioisotopes
#32
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,290
of 172,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radioisotopes
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.