↓ Skip to main content

Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?
Published in
Scientometrics, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2253-x
Authors

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Flavia Di Costa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 8 9%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,476
of 2,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,601
of 428,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#54
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.