| Title |
Estimation and propagation of volcanic source parameter uncertainty in an ash transport and dispersal model: application to the Eyjafjallajokull plume of 14–16 April 2010
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00445-012-0665-2 |
| Authors |
Marcus Bursik, Matthew Jones, Simon Carn, Ken Dean, Abani Patra, Michael Pavolonis, E. Bruce Pitman, Tarunraj Singh, Puneet Singla, Peter Webley, Halldor Bjornsson, Maurizio Ripepe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 49% |
| Engineering | 7 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,404,175
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#249
of 1,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,059
of 181,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.