↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of leaf water use efficiency of oak and sycamore in the canopy over two growing seasons

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of leaf water use efficiency of oak and sycamore in the canopy over two growing seasons
Published in
Trees, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00468-009-0399-8
Authors

Victoria J. Stokes, Michael D. Morecroft, James I. L. Morison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 39%
Environmental Science 11 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2010.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#145
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,539
of 171,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them