↓ Skip to main content

Cutaneous and diphtheritic avian poxvirus infection in a nestling Southern Giant Petrel (Macronectes giganteus) from Antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Cutaneous and diphtheritic avian poxvirus infection in a nestling Southern Giant Petrel (Macronectes giganteus) from Antarctica
Published in
Polar Biology, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00300-007-0390-z
Authors

Valerie Shearn-Bochsler, D. Earl Green, Kathryn A. Converse, Douglas E. Docherty, Teresa Thiel, Heidi N. Geisz, William R. Fraser, Donna L. Patterson-Fraser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Chile 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 36%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 54%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,234
of 156,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.