↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedures: Development of phobic response during scan and at one-month follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, August 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedures: Development of phobic response during scan and at one-month follow-up
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, August 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00844886
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Christine Kilborn, Elise E. Labbé

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 30%
Other 6 14%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#489
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,385
of 15,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them