↓ Skip to main content

Flash flood disaster-nîmes, France, 1988

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, July 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Flash flood disaster-nîmes, France, 1988
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, July 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00145001
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Duclos, O. Vidonne, P. Beuf, P. Perray, A. Stoebner

Abstract

On October 3, 1988, at 7:45 a.m. a flash flood occurred in the region of Nîmes, France. Though the homes of 45,000 people were damaged and more than 1,100 vehicles were destroyed, only 3 severe injuries and 9 deaths were reported. A community survey was conducted to study (1) what factors might have contributed to the limited number of deaths, (2) the reactions of the population to the disaster, and (3) the health effects associated with the impact and postimpact phases of the disaster. Overall, 108 questionnaires were completed from a systematic sample of 187 households living in ground-level dwellings in two of the most seriously affected areas of the city. Only 17% of all interviewees knew that they lived in an area subject to flood. When they realized they were in danger, 93% of all persons were in their houses or other buildings, 4% were in the streets, and 3% were in cars. Fifty-six percent of the interviewees tried to get to safety. Thirty percent of the interviewees reported that they were rescued; 20% of these persons reported being saved from a direct life threat. Neighbors (40%), family members (20%), firefighters (12%), the Red Cross (10%), and military personnel (8%) conducted rescue operations. Six percent of all members of interviewed households were reportedly suffering mild injuries that, in 70% of these cases, had been sustained during the impact phase. Health problems and injuries during the postimpact phase may have been limited by the response of trained military personnel and by the distribution of boots and gloves to other responders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 28%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 18%
Social Sciences 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#608
of 1,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,883
of 16,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them