↓ Skip to main content

Reflectance spectroscopy: to shed new light on the capillary refill test

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biophotonics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflectance spectroscopy: to shed new light on the capillary refill test
Published in
Journal of Biophotonics, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/jbio.201700043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rani Toll John, Joakim Henricson, Gert E Nilsson, Daniel Wilhelms, Chris D. Anderson

Abstract

To use Bioengineering methodology is used to achieve, at five anatomical sites, a detailed, quantitative assessment of the return of blood content to the blanched area, during the Capillary Refill (CR) test. An observational, non-randomized, experimental study on 23 healthy subjects (14 females) was performed in our climate controlled skin physiology laboratory. Our main outcome measures were based on the chronological assessment and quantification of red blood cell concentration (RBC) after the release of blanching pressure in the CR test, using Tissue Viability Imaging (TiVi), a digital photographic technique based on polarisation spectroscopy. TiVi enabled collection of detailed data on skin RBC concentration during the CR test. The results were shown as curves with skin blood concentration (TiVi-value) on the y-axis and the time on the x-axis. Quantitative CR responses showed site and temperature variability. We also suggest possible objective endpoint values from the capillary refill curve. Detailed data on skin RBC concentration during the CR test is easily obtained and allows objective determination of end points not possible to achieve by naked eye assessment. These findings have the potential to place the utility of the CR test in a clinical setting in a new light. Picture: Regular photograph and TiVi Image showing CR test and corresponding graph for the CR response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 35%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Engineering 4 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,256,319
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biophotonics
#1,094
of 2,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,256
of 317,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biophotonics
#31
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.