↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic recovery of continental antarctic cryptogams after winter

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Metabolic recovery of continental antarctic cryptogams after winter
Published in
Polar Biology, March 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00300-004-0606-4
Authors

M. Schlensog, S. Pannewitz, T. G. A. Green, B. Schroeter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 59%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#692
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,243
of 66,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.