↓ Skip to main content

Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology
Published in
NanoEthics, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11569-008-0035-x
Authors

Jennifer Kuzma, John C. Besley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Philosophy 5 10%
Chemistry 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 17 35%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,915,678
of 23,850,698 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#88
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,560
of 80,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,850,698 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them