↓ Skip to main content

Dual-theatre high-intensity lists (HIT) for day-case minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a prospective service evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Quality, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dual-theatre high-intensity lists (HIT) for day-case minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a prospective service evaluation
Published in
BMJ Open Quality, September 2026
DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003918
Authors

Christian Chess, Laura Bateman, Catherine Ashworth, Stuart Gillett

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2026.
All research outputs
#28,598,653
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#1,008
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,408
of 157,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.