↓ Skip to main content

The emergence of antibiotic resistance: Myths and facts in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The emergence of antibiotic resistance: Myths and facts in clinical practice
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01709702
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. T. Hamilton-Miller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,288,563
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,414
of 5,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,688
of 14,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.