| Title |
Predictors of the Growing Influence of Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0155-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ann S. O’Malley, Hoangmai H. Pham, James D. Reschovsky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,092,738
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#924
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,979
of 78,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.