↓ Skip to main content

Recent trends in breast cancer incidence in US white women by county-level urban/rural and poverty status

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Recent trends in breast cancer incidence in US white women by county-level urban/rural and poverty status
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-7-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia K Hausauer, Theresa HM Keegan, Ellen T Chang, Sally L Glaser, Holly Howe, Christina A Clarke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Social Sciences 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,614
of 3,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,666
of 111,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.