Title |
Changing the Brain, Changing the Society: Clinical and Ethical Implications of Neuromodulation Techniques in Neurology and Psychiatry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brain Topography, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10548-013-0325-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrik Vuilleumier, David Sander, Bernard Baertschi |
Abstract |
New neurotechnologies for modulating brain functions are becoming increasingly powerful and applicable to diverse diseases, but raise new questions for clinicians, ethicists, policy makers, and laymen. This issue of Brain Topography gathers several papers exploring the clinical and ethical implications of several invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation approaches. The opportunities and challenges associated with the emergence of neuro-engineering solutions to brain research and brain repair require a close dialogue between multiple disciplines, as well as open discussion with the general public. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 27% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 23% |
Engineering | 3 | 12% |
Philosophy | 2 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,290,667
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#303
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,480
of 211,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.