Title |
Flexible Bronchoscopy in Non-resolving Pneumonia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12098-017-2372-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Javeed Iqbal Bhat, Wasim Ahmad Wani, Qazi Iqbal Ahmad, Bashir Ahmad Charoo, Syed Wajid Ali, Ambreen Ali Ahangar, Muzafar Ahmad |
Abstract |
To study the utility of diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in children with non-resolving pneumonia. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care hospital from July 2015 through June 2016. Fifty-two consecutive children of both genders from 1 mo to 14 y of age with a diagnosis of non-resolving pneumonia were included. Flexible bronchoscopy was done in all patients with or without bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). BAL was sent for gram staining, culture, gene expert™ and lipid laden macrophages examination. Main outcome measures were to find any morphological abnormality in the tracheobronchial tree and organism profile of a positive BAL culture. During the period of 12 mo, 52 consecutive patients of non-resolving pneumonia were enrolled. Median (IQR) age of the study population was 12 (68.8) mo. Mean ± SD duration of illness was 22.7 ± 5.6 d. Flexible bronchoscopy was found to be very safe and effective tool that directly led to definitive diagnosis in 30.7% of cases. It was positive for different organisms in 22 (52.3%) children. Neglected foreign body was seen in five patients. Non-resolving pneumonia is often an area of clinical dilemma. Bacterial infections are the commonest etiology. Non-infectious causes like tracheobronchomalacia and foreign body aspiration are other important etiologies to be looked for. Early bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage analysis can play a crucial role in the evaluation of these patients and may provide an important clue or strongly support the specific diagnosis. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Librarian | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 66% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |