↓ Skip to main content

The nutritional physiology of sharks

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
The nutritional physiology of sharks
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11160-017-9481-2
Authors

Samantha C. Leigh, Yannis Papastamatiou, Donovan P. German

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 20%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Other 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 43%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 45 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,344,450
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#379
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,139
of 319,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.