↓ Skip to main content

Collective Responsibility

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Ethics, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 311)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Collective Responsibility
Published in
The Journal of Ethics, June 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015823716891
Authors

Jan Narveson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 43%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,597,135
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Ethics
#41
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,303
of 126,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them