| Title |
When Do Patients and Their Physicians Agree on Diabetes Treatment Goals and Strategies, and What Difference Does It Make?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21132.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele Heisler, Sandeep Vijan, Robert M Anderson, Peter A Ubel, Steven J Bernstein, Timothy P Hofer |
| Abstract |
For patients with chronic illnesses, it is hypothesized that effective patient-provider collaboration contributes to improved patient self-care by promoting greater agreement on patient-specific treatment goals and strategies. However, this hypothesis has not been tested in actual encounters of patients with their own physicians. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 27% |
| Psychology | 31 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,965,752
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,135
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,705
of 142,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.