↓ Skip to main content

A prospective study of 750 definite spider bites, with expert spider identification

Overview of attention for article published in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective study of 750 definite spider bites, with expert spider identification
Published in
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, November 2002
DOI 10.1093/qjmed/95.11.723
Pubmed ID
Authors

G K Isbister, M R Gray

Abstract

Spider bite is a subject of much medical mythology with prevalent fears that spiders cause severe envenoming, with neurotoxic effects or necrotic ulcers. Clinical experience and small studies suggest otherwise, but this has not been confirmed by prospective studies of bites by identified spiders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 7%
United States 3 5%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 48 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 21%
Student > Master 11 20%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Professor 6 11%
Other 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 38%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,012,397
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#106
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#830
of 52,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.