↓ Skip to main content

Animal virus receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Animal virus receptors
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, October 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02816247
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Jindrák, L. Grubhoffer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 73%
Unspecified 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#127
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,124
of 35,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them