↓ Skip to main content

Data reporting standards: making the things we use better

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Data reporting standards: making the things we use better
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/gm111
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Quackenbush

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 10%
United Kingdom 2 6%
Switzerland 1 3%
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 58%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 35%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 35%
Computer Science 7 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,248
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,611
of 177,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.