↓ Skip to main content

The long‐term cost‐effectiveness of fetal monitoring during labour: a comparison of cardiotocography complemented with ST analysis versus cardiotocography alone

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The long‐term cost‐effectiveness of fetal monitoring during labour: a comparison of cardiotocography complemented with ST analysis versus cardiotocography alone
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, November 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01935.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Heintz, T‐H Brodtkorb, N Nelson, L‐Å Levin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 43%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,556,131
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#3,470
of 6,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,624
of 100,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.