↓ Skip to main content

Patient‐reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ‐5D data

Overview of attention for article published in Health economics (Online), July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient‐reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ‐5D data
Published in
Health economics (Online), July 2010
DOI 10.1002/hec.1608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy J. Devlin, David Parkin, John Browne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 4%
United States 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 167 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Other 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 6%
Psychology 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 40 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,760,171
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health economics (Online)
#657
of 2,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,310
of 104,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health economics (Online)
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.