↓ Skip to main content

Effects of ZNF804A on auditory P300 response in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Psychiatry, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of ZNF804A on auditory P300 response in schizophrenia
Published in
Translational Psychiatry, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/tp.2013.115
Pubmed ID
Authors

T O'Donoghue, D W Morris, C Fahey, A Da Costa, S Moore, E Cummings, G Leicht, S Karch, D Hoerold, D Tropea, J J Foxe, M Gill, A Corvin, G Donohoe

Abstract

The common variant rs1344706 within the zinc-finger protein gene ZNF804A has been strongly implicated in schizophrenia (SZ) susceptibility by a series of recent genetic association studies. Although associated with a pattern of altered neural connectivity, evidence that increased risk is mediated by an effect on cognitive deficits associated with the disorder has been equivocal. This study investigated whether the same ZNF804A risk allele was associated with variation in the P300 auditory-evoked response, a cognitively relevant putative endophenotype for SZ. We compared P300 responses in carriers and noncarriers of the ZNF804A risk allele genotype groups in Irish patients and controls (n=97). P300 response was observed to vary according to genotype in this sample, such that risk allele carriers showed relatively higher P300 response compared with noncarriers. This finding accords with behavioural data reported by our group and others. It is also consistent with the idea that ZNF804A may have an impact on cortical efficiency, reflected in the higher levels of activations required to achieve comparable behavioural accuracy on the task used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 22%
Neuroscience 9 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Psychology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2015.
All research outputs
#13,400,446
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Translational Psychiatry
#2,166
of 3,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,265
of 306,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Psychiatry
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.