↓ Skip to main content

Sensory-evoked synaptic integration in cerebellar and cerebral cortical neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory-evoked synaptic integration in cerebellar and cerebral cortical neurons
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/nrn3648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Chadderton, Andreas T. Schaefer, Stephen R. Williams, Troy W. Margrie

Abstract

Neurons integrate synaptic inputs across time and space, a process that determines the transformation of input signals into action potential output. This article explores how synaptic integration contributes to the richness of sensory signalling in the cerebellar and cerebral cortices. Whether a neuron receives a few or a few thousand discrete inputs, most evoked synaptic activity generates only subthreshold membrane potential fluctuations. Sensory tuning of synaptic inputs is typically broad, but short-term dynamics and the interplay between excitation and inhibition restrict action potential firing to narrow windows of opportunity. We highlight the challenges and limitations of the use of somatic recordings in the study of synaptic integration and the importance of active dendritic mechanisms in sensory processing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
France 6 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 337 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 28%
Researcher 88 24%
Student > Master 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 38 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 40%
Neuroscience 106 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Engineering 19 5%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 39 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,284,788
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#1,702
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,250
of 314,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#27
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.