↓ Skip to main content

Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets

Overview of attention for article published in Crime, Law and Social Change, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets
Published in
Crime, Law and Social Change, February 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:cris.0000015283.13923.aa
Authors

Gerben Bruinsma, Wim Bernasco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Crime, Law and Social Change
#115
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,199
of 146,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crime, Law and Social Change
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them