↓ Skip to main content

Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines IV. Optimisation of sample preparation

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science International, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines IV. Optimisation of sample preparation
Published in
Forensic Science International, November 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.10.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kjell Andersson, Kaisa Jalava, Eric Lock, Henk Huizer, Elisabet Kaa, Alvaro Lopes, Anneke Poortman-van der Meer, Michael D. Cole, Johan Dahlén, Erkki Sippola

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Researcher 7 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science International
#1,411
of 4,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,665
of 168,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science International
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.