↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and comparison of potential denitrifiers in microbial mats from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Characterization and comparison of potential denitrifiers in microbial mats from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica
Published in
Polar Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00300-013-1440-3
Authors

Rocio J. Alcántara-Hernández, Carla M. Centeno, Alejandro Ponce-Mendoza, Silvia Batista, Martin Merino-Ibarra, Julio Campo, Luisa I. Falcón

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,771,194
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#1,213
of 1,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,663
of 305,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.