| Title |
Macroprudential Policy in a Fisherian Model of Financial Innovation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IMF Economic Review, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1057/imfer.2012.9 |
| Authors |
Javier Bianchi, Emine Boz, Enrique Gabriel Mendoza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 27% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 41 | 69% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,872,193
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#112
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,046
of 181,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.