You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian H. Hyett, Marwan S. Abougergi, Joseph P. Charpentier, Navin L. Kumar, Suzana Brozovic, Brian L. Claggett, Anne C. Travis, John R. Saltzman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 50% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sudan | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,235,658
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#4,055
of 5,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,763
of 288,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#33
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.