Title |
Treatment of Thoracic Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Esophageal Perforations with Endoluminal Stents: Efficacy and Current Limitations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, March 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11605-008-0500-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dirk Tuebergen, Emile Rijcken, Rudolf Mennigen, Ann M. Hopkins, Norbert Senninger, Matthias Bruewer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Other | 17 | 25% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 69% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,450,007
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#372
of 2,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,905
of 95,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.