Title |
Low-Protein Diet for Diabetic Nephropathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Diabetes Reports, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11892-014-0523-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Toshiki Otoda, Keizo Kanasaki, Daisuke Koya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#401
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,045
of 228,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.