↓ Skip to main content

Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10151-013-0982-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Arslan, S. Said Kokcam, H. Koksal, E. Turan, A. Atay, O. Dogru

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#703
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,853
of 193,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.