| Title |
Local application of gentamicin collagen implants in the prophylaxis of surgical site infections following gastrointestinal surgery: a review of clinical experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-010-0593-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. F. J. de Bruin, M. P. Gosselink, E. van der Harst, H. J. T. Rutten |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#703
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,702
of 94,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.