| Title |
Evaluation of organic infusions and synthetic compounds mediating oviposition inAedes albopictus andAedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, November 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02033681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra A. Allan, Daniel L. Kline |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 52% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,743,806
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#301
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,195
of 25,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them