| Title |
Reemergence of Chikungunya virus in Indian Subcontinent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
VirusDisease, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13337-010-0012-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. V. M. Naresh Kumar, D. V. R. Sai Gopal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from VirusDisease
#81
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,450
of 104,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VirusDisease
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.