Title |
The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gianfranco Damiani, Luigi Pinnarelli, Simona C Colosimo, Roberta Almiento, Lorella Sicuro, Rocco Galasso, Lorenzo Sommella, Walter Ricciardi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 5% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
Sweden | 2 | 1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 147 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 40 | 24% |
Researcher | 27 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
Professor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 38 | 23% |
Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 43% |
Computer Science | 28 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,449,906
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,593
of 7,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,075
of 168,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.